Wednesday 30 October 2019

Role of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in the Rural Development of India A Way Forward


                                                                                                             - *Dr. S. Vijay Kumar

          Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises have been accepted as the engine of economic growth and  for promoting equitable development all over the world, especially in India in view of second highly populated country in the world. Micro and small scale enterprises have existed in rural India since ages in the form of traditional skills. Recently, rural entrepreneurship has emerged as a dynamic concept. There is lot of scope for rural entrepreneurship in SMEs (Small and Medium Enterprises) sector economy which plays a vital role in providing employment and income for the poor and unemployed in rural areas. As the population grows there will be pressure on land and the growth in the agricultural production cannot absorb the ever increasing rural labor force in agricultural employment. This leaves the rural non-farm sector in the form of rural SMEs to absorb those released from agriculture but not absorbed in the urban industries. The scope of rural industries is considered basically a question of properly utilizing the unexploited natural and human resources and tapping vast material existing in the countryside. The features of rural industrialization are low investment of capital, labour intensity and use of simple technology by employing local human and material resources. Thus, a judicious mix of local manpower with the local resource is necessary to bring about a viable development in these areas. In the era of globalization, entrepreneurship development in the rural context is a challenge. According to 2011 Census 68.84% people are living in rural areas of India. People in rural areas suffer with unemployment, poor infrastructure facilities which may be solved with the development of the rural entrepreneurs.Rural Entrepreneurship can be defined as entrepreneurship emerging at village level which can take place in a variety of fields of endeavor such as business, industry, agriculture and acts as a potent factor for economic development”. But, these rural entrepreneurs are suffering with various problems like fear of risk, lack of finance, illiteracy, and competition from the urban entrepreneurs. Rural entrepreneurs increase the standard of living and purchasing power of the people by offering employment opportunity to the people in villages. This paper is an attempt to understand the problems and challenges of rural entrepreneurship in the context of rural development in India and possible suggestions are given to overcome the problems.
The MSME became operational on October 02, 2006. As per MSME Act-2006, MSMEs are classified into two categories. They are:
1. Manufacturing Enterprises-The enterprises engaged in the manufacture or production of goods (as per Development and regulation) Act, 1951 or employing plant and machinery in the process of value addition to the final product having a distinct name or character or use.

2. Service Enterprises:-The enterprises engaged in providing or rendering of services and are defined in terms of investment in equipment.

Head & Professor (Associate) of Economics (Retd.), Kakatiya Government (UG&PG) College (NAAC “A” Grade), Hanamkonda, Warangal District (Telangana State). Ex - Member Board of Studies, Kakatiya University, Warangal – 506 009 (India).

In February, 2018, the Union Cabinet chaired by the Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi has approved changes in the definition of the MSMEs. Now, MSMEs will be defined on the basis of ‘annual turnover’ instead of earlier definition of investment in plant & machinery/equipment. It is expected that the changes made in the definition of the MSMEs will enhance the ease of doing business and very soon the contribution of manufacturing sector in the Indian GDP will touch to 25 percent. The revised classification of MSMEs is based on turnover has made it easier for both the government and industries to recognize a business as an MSME. The following table reveals the new definition of the MSMEs in India:

                                                              Goods & Services
    Micro Enterprises
 Annual turnover is less than Rs.5 Crores.
    Small Enterprises
 Annual turnover is between Rs. 5 Crores to Rs. 75 Crores.
    Medium Enterprises
 Annual turnover is between Rs. 75 Crores to Rs. 250 Crores.

2019-20 Budget Highlights for MSMEs:
1.      An all-time high allocation of Rs.7011.29 crore has been made in the Budget of 2019-20.
2.      The flagship scheme for employment generation of the Ministry, namely Prime Minister Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP) got an all-time high allocation of Rs.2327 crore. This reiterates Government’s focus on creation of sustainable employment in the non-farm micro enterprise sector.
3.      For ensuring seamless credit guarantee to Micro and Small enterprises, Rs.597 crore has been provided under the Credit Support Programme.
4.      To provide funding for the 2% interest rebate on incremental loan up to Rs.1 Crore for GST-registered MSME units, Rs. 350 crore has been provided under ‘Interest Subvention Scheme for Incremental Credit to MSMEs’.
5.      Under the recent announcements made on 2nd November 2018, encompassing multiple initiatives and interventions for the MSME sector, 20 large and 100 small Technology Centres are going to be set up with a support of Rs.6000 Crore. This Budget has made allocation for this initiative.
6.      For setting up clusters in the manufacturing and artisan sectors, Rs.450 crore has been allocated. Allocation under National SCST-Hub has been increased substantially.
7.      Mission Solar Charkha has been launched in the current financial year, for which Rs.143 crore has been allocated under the BE 2019-20. The scheme envisages setting up production clusters, each employing 2000 youth in the rural area, at least 50% of which would be women.
8.      “Make in India”, with particular emphasis on Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, is one of the major focus areas of the Union Budget this year.
9.      For the MSME sector, Rs 350 crore has been allocated for FY 2019-20 under the Interest Subvention Scheme, for 2% interest subvention for all GST registered MSMEs, on fresh or incremental loans.
10.  Lower rate of 25 % Corporate Tax extended to companies with annual turnover up to Rs 400 crore from earlier cap of up to Rs 250 crore.
11.  Under the Scheme of Fund for Up gradation and Regeneration of Traditional Industries’ (SFURTI) 100 new clusters will be set up during 2019-20 enabling 50,000 artisans to join the economic value chain. Focused sectors are Bamboo, Honey and Khadi clusters.

12.  The Scheme for Promotion of Innovation, Rural Industry and Entrepreneurship’ (ASPIRE) would be consolidated for setting up of 80 Livelihood Business Incubators (LBIs) and 20 Technology Business Incubators (TBIs)in 2019-20 to develop 75,000 skilled entrepreneurs in agro-rural industry sectors.
Role of MSMEs in India’s Rural Economic Development: The scope of rural industries is considered basically a question of properly utilizing the unexploited natural and human resources and tapping vast material existing in the countryside. The features of rural industrialization are low investment of capital, labour intensity and use of simple technology by employing local human and material resources. Thus, a judicious mix of local manpower with the local resource is necessary to bring about a viable development in these areas. MSME  are the backbone, vibrant and dynamic sector of the Indian economy. The estimated contribution of MSME sector (including service segment) to GDP during 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13 are 36.69 per cent, 37.97 per cent and 37.54 per cent respectively. Based on the export data maintained by Director General of Commercial Intelligence & Statistics, Ministry of Commerce about the share of MSMEs in India’s total export, for the year 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15, has been estimated as 43.00 per cent, 42.38 per cent and 44.70 per cent respectively. According to the assessments of the Ministry of MSME, Government of India, the sector generates around 100 million jobs through over 46 million units situated throughout  the country and contributes to 45% of India’s total industrial employment, 45% of India’s total exports and 95% of all industrial units of the country and more than 6000 types of products are manufactured in these industries (As per msme.gov.in). MSMEs contribute around 6.11% of the manufacturing GDP and 24.63% of the GDP from service activities. MSME sector has consistently growing at the average rate of 10% annually. The contribution of this sector to the country's Gross Domestic Product is about 8%. A study done by the Confederation of Indian Industries (CII) on the Indian MSMEs ministry reveals that the MSME's contribution will be around 50% in the India's GDP by 2025. Many units of MSMEs are located in rural areas, which are checking the migration from rural areas to urban areas. MSMEs are transforming into a new business environment characterized by the emergence of national and global supply chains where they share a symbiotic relationship with hefty corporations.
Factors which led to growth of MSMEs:
Campaigns like Skill India, Startup India, Digital India and Make in India aim to provide MSME players with a level playing field and a definitive push towards enhanced productivity.
Digitization: Increasing internet penetration, customer’s familiarization with digital payments fuelled by B2C ecommerce players facilitate MSME sector growth.
Tie-ups with new-age non-banking finance (Fin. Tech) companies allowed access to timely collateral free finance to MSMEs.
Changing employment patterns: Younger generation shifting from agriculture towards entrepreneurial activities creating job prospects for others.
Advantages of MSMEs:
Inclusive growth: MSMEs promote inclusive growth by providing employment opportunities in rural areas especially to people belonging to weaker sections of the society.

Financial inclusion: Small industries and retail businesses in tier-II and tier-III cities create opportunities for people to use banking services and products.
Promote innovation: It provides opportunity for budding entrepreneurs to build creative products boosting business competition and fuels growth.
Boosting Economic Growth and Development: MSMEs are boosting economic growth and development at regional, national and global levels. With its dexterity and dynamism, the sector has shown venerable innovativeness and malleability to survive economic shocks, even of the gravest nature.
Maximum Opportunities for both Self-employment and Wage-employment: Indian MSME sector offers maximum opportunities for both self-employment and wage-employment outside the agricultural sector and contributes in constructing an inclusive and sustainable society in numerous ways through making of non-farm livelihood at meager cost, balanced regional development, gender and social balance, environmentally sustainable development etc. As MSMEs are usually labour-intensive, they have the ability to create more jobs. Further, in view of the on-going implications of climate change, it is necessary that the MSME sector is prepared to absorb millions who may be rendered unemployed in the agriculture sector. Many more rewarding opportunities can be tapped by Indian MSMEs in the foundry industry, electronics industry, chemicals, leather, textiles, agro and food processing, pharmaceuticals, transport and tourism industries, etc. The globalization of industries has gradually drawn SMEs into global value chains through diverse types of cross-border activities.
MSMEs in India is of diversity: MSME sector in India claims diversity in terms of its size, level of technology employed, range of products and services provided and target markets. MSMEs have been credited to provide at least ten components that were used in India’s Mangalyaan (Mars Orbiter Mission probe) and in ISRO’s most ambitious mission like Chandrayaan I & II.
Decentralized Industrial Development, Better Distribution of Wealth and Investment: MSMEs expansion, especially in rural play imperative role in the economic expansion of the country and results in decentralized industrial development, better distribution of wealth and investment.
Reduction of Poverty and Unemployment: Most of the MSMEs are of labour intensive and creates large scale employment opportunities for the rural people. MSMEs provides a solution to the growing problem of large-scale unemployment and underemployment of rural India. Through rural entrepreneurship development programme, unemployed people can opt for self-employment. In this respect, several programmes like National Rural Employment Programme (NREP), Integrated Rural Development Programme (IRDP), etc. are in operation in India to help the potential entrepreneurs.

Check on migration of rural population: Rural population moves towards urban for various reasons like income generation, searching good job, utilize various facilities etc. MSMEs will bring in or develop infrastructural facilities like roads, power, bridges etc. It reduces the gaps and disparities in income between rural and urban areas. Rural MSMEs can avoid the migration of people from rural to urban areas in search of jobs.

Formation of Capital: MSMEs by placing profitable business proposition attract investment to ensure private participation in the industrialization process. The otherwise idle savings are channelized for investment in business ventures which in turn provides return. Again the savings are invested giving a multiplier effect to the process of capital formation.

Balanced regional development: MSMEs in rural areas controls the concentration of industry in urban areas by setting small scale units in remote areas, successful entrepreneurship development programmes can help in achieving balanced regional development.

Promotion of artistic activities: Rural industries also help protect and promote the art and handicrafts, i.e. the age-old rich heritage of the country.

Check on social evils: The growth of MSMEs in rural areas reduces the social evils like poverty, social tensions, atmospheric pollution, the growth of slums and ignorance of inhabitants etc.

Awaken the rural youth: MSMEs in rural areas encourages young and promising entrepreneurs to develop and carry out entrepreneurial activities in the rural sector.

Improves standard of living: MSMEs in rural will also increase the literacy rate of rural people. Their education and self-employment will prosper the community, thus improving their standard of living.

Proper utilization of local resources: MSMEs in rural  will help in the maximum utilization of local resources like raw materials and labour for productive purposes and thus increase productivity. Efficient and effective use of limited resources by the entrepreneurs leads to overall economic development of an area.

Improvement in per capita income: MSMEs generates more output, employment and wealth by exploiting new opportunities, thereby helping to improve the per capita income of rural people.
General Employment: MSMEs are  not the job seekers but job creators and job providers. With the globalization process the government jobs are shrinking leaving many unemployed. In the circumstances, the entrepreneurs and their enterprises are the only hope and source of direct and indirect employment generation. Employment is generated directly by the requirement of the large enterprises and indirectly by ancilliariation and consequential development activities.

National Self-reliance: They are the corner stores of national self-reliance. They help to manufacture indigenous substitutes to imported products which reduce the dependence on foreign countries. There is also a possibility of exporting goods and services to earn foreign exchange for the country. Hence, the import substitution and export promotion ensure economic independence and the country becomes self-reliance.

Planned Production: MSMEs are considered as economic agents since they unite all means of production. All the factors of production i.e., land, labour, Capital and enterprise are brought together to get the desired production. This will help to make use all the factors of production with proper judgment, perseverance and knowledge of the world of business. The least combination of factors is possible avoiding unnecessary wastages of resources.

Promote prosperity: Improvements in local productivity can promote prosperity.

Earnings of foreign exchange: MSMEs plays significant role in increasing the foreign exchange earnings of the country through export of their produce.

Challenges of MSMEs: Fiscal discipline, Support from Government Departments, Capital, Modern technology, Market Strategy, Skilled labour, Regulatory burden and Annual filings etc.

Problems of MSMEs: Lack of adequate capital and timely finance. Non-availability of suitable technology. Competition from MNCs. Low production capacity. Ineffective marketing strategy. Constraints on modernization & expansions. Inferior quality impact export competitiveness. Cumbersome government procedures and rules for establishing new units. Bureaucratic delays in getting clearances. Poor litigation system in the country. Non availability of skilled labour at affordable cost. Lack of training and skill development programmes.  Complex labor laws and red-tapism. Poor infrastructure. Access to modern technology. Getting statutory clearances related to power, environment, labour etc. Problem of quality raw material. Use of traditional machines results in low productivity. Under-utilization of installed capacities. Technological obsolescence. Lack of organized market channels. Imperfect knowledge of market conditions. Unorganized nature of operations. Deficient managerial and technical skills. Government schemes to promote MSMEs
  • Udyami Mitra Portal : launched by SIDBI to improve accessibility of credit and handholding services to MSMEs.
  • MSME Sambandh : To monitor the implementation of the public procurement from MSMEs by Central Public Sector Enterprises.
  • MSME Samadhaan -MSME Delayed Payment Portal –– will empower Micro and Small entrepreneurs across the country to directly register their cases relating to delayed payments by Central Ministries/Departments/CPSEs/State Governments.
  • Digital MSME Scheme : It involves usage of Cloud Computing where MSMEs use the internet to access common as well as tailor-made IT infrastructure
  • Prime Minister Employment Generation Programme : It is a credit linked subsidy program under Ministry of MSME.
  • Revamped Scheme of Fund for Regeneration Of Traditional Industries (SFURTI) : organizes traditional industries and artisans into clusters and make them competitive by enhancing their marketability & equipping them with improved skills.
  • A Scheme for Promoting Innovation, Rural Industry & Entrepreneurship (ASPIRE) : creates new jobs & reduce unemployment, promotes entrepreneurship culture, facilitates innovative business solution etc.
  • National Manufacturing Competitiveness Programme (NMCP) : to develop global competitiveness among Indian MSMEs by improving their processes, designs, technology and market access.
  • Micro & Small Enterprises Cluster Development Programme (MSE-CDP) - adopts cluster development approach for enhancing the productivity and competitiveness as well as capacity building of MSMEs.
  • Credit Linked Capital Subsidy Scheme (CLCSS) is operational for upgradation of technology for MSMEs.
Other recent initiatives to promote MSMEs:
  • In June 2019, RBI committee headed by former SEBI Chairman UK Sinha suggested a Rs 5,000 crore stressed asset fund for the MSME sector to provide relief to small businesses hurt by demonetization, GST, and an ongoing liquidity crisis.

·        It has also recommended doubling the cap on collateral-free loans to Rs 20 lakh from the current Rs 10 lakh extended to borrowers falling under the Mudra scheme, self-help groups, and MSMEs.
  • MSME Ministry announced in June 2019 to lift the ban on entry of corporates and private players in the MSME sector to pave way for the formation of 700 clusters to reduce dependence on imports as well as for job creation.
  • MSME Ministry is also planning to set up enterprise facilitation centres across the country to make smaller businesses more competitive and help them integrate with big enterprises.
Therefore, the government should continue to put concerted efforts for holistic development of MSMEs in key areas like human capacity development, knowledge services, access to finance, technology, infrastructure, market access, and ease of doing business.

International Experiences:

  • According to World Bank, formal SMEs contribute up to 60% of total employment and up to 40% of national income (GDP) in emerging economies.
  • 600 million jobs will be needed in the next 15 years to absorb the growing global workforce, mainly in Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. In emerging markets, most formal jobs are generated by SMEs, which also create 4 out of 5 new positions.
  • However, access to credit remains a major problem to the MSME sector globally.
·        In globalised world, it is imperative to enable MSMEs to adapt and thrive in a more open environment and participate more actively in the digital transformation, to boost economic growth and deliver a more inclusive globalization.
Way Forward:
·        Today enterprises need to adopt best practices and follow international standards to go forward for offering innovative solutions.
·        Focus should be on transfer of information and skill development to effectively use the transferred technology.
·        There is an urgent need to upgrade infrastructure utilities (like water, power supply, road/rail) for any enterprise to run its operations successfully.
·        Entrepreneurs need to develop quality conscious mindsets embedded in the organisational culture.
·        Sensitization and handholding of MSMEs at different and upgraded level of certification is the need of the hour.
Finally, as recommended by India MSME Report 2018, we need an entitlement approach that can have the potential of compelling all related stakeholders to work on a common national agenda and solutions under a scientifically structured framework. This approach demands the identification and analysis of major security threats to the MSMEs, and entrepreneurship at the grass root level.
Solutions:        
·        Utilization of limited resources (Human & Economic) in optimum manner.
·        Need to be educated and informed about the latest developments taking place globally.
·        Acquire necessary skills to keep pace with the global developments.
·        Grab the market opportunities and various key strategies need to be adopted to promote and support the MSMEs.
·        Appropriate technologies for the MSME sector  should  be developed and  made available to them.
·        Technological advancement and  guidance
·        Panel of experts and consultants should be prepared  to help MSMEs.
·        There should be detailed surveys  to assess the technical and  financial needs of the MSME.
·        Training and development, awareness programs should be provided to MSMEs.
·        Sufficient credit facility should be made available.
·        Relaxation in labor laws and eradication of red tapism.
·        Proper Research and Development should be developed for innovative method of  production, service rendering and marketing.

Conclusion: MSMEs plays a vital role in the economic development of India, particularly in the rural economy. It helps in generating employment opportunities in the rural areas with low capital, raising the real income of the people, contributing to the development of agriculture by reducing disguised unemployment, reducing poverty, migration, economic disparity, unemployment. Government should go for periodical appraisal of MSMEs development schemes and programmes in order to uplift rural areas. MSMEs finds it difficult to take off is due to lack of capital, risk taking and innovation. They are the way of converting developing country into developed nation. Promotion of MSMEs are extremely important in the context of producing gainful employment and reducing the widening disparities between the rural and urban. MSME’s provide self dependency and it is the only way to solve the problem of unemployment in a populous country like India. MSME’s are boon for reducing regional imbalances and a means  to utilize the natural and abundant human  resources available in India.


Thursday 3 October 2019

National Seminar (18 & 19th, 2019) Photos, ISEC, Bangalore, India





BR Ambhedkar’s Views on Panchayat Raj Institutions - Social Justice, Reference to 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments and Decentralization With A Critical Analysis

This Paper was Presented in the National Seminar (18th & 19th September, 2019): “Social Justice and Working of Panchayats in India: Revisiting Ambedkar School of Thought” at the Institute for Social and Economic Change (ISEC), Bangalore, India.
-*Dr. S. Vijay Kumar
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar believed that the village represented regressive India, a source of oppression. He argued against Panchayats as he was apprehensive about the continuation of caste Hindus hegemony. Further he opined that villages in India were caste-ridden and had little prospects of success as institutions of self-government. His Hindu code bill was an idea to bring equality and justice in society through emancipation of women by extending equal property rights to women. He held that the emancipation of Dalits in India was possible only through the three-pronged approached of education, agitation and organization. He was viewed  essentially as a egalitarian and a social reformer rather than a nationalist.With reference to 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment Acts,we can remember his view that “The remedy lay in creating an egalitarian and truly democratic panchayat raj system in the country”. He also fought for providing reservation in Panchayats to involve all depressed classes in the rural governance.Regarding Decentralization (Self Government) Ambhedkar said - “Unless I am satisfied that every self-governing institution has provisions in it which give the depressed classes special representation in order to protect their rights, and until that is done, I am afraid it will not be possible for me to assent to the first part of the Bill.” Now, the time has come for revisiting (reviewing) the concern of Ambedkar School of Thought with relevance to the present day.This paper attempts to focus on “BR Ambhedkar’s Views on Panchayat Raj Institutions - Social Justice, Reference to 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments  and Decentralization With  A Critical Analysis”.

Objectives of the Study:
1) Ambhedkar and Panchayat Raj Institutions
2) Ambhedkar – Social Justice (A Social Reformer)
3)Ambhedkar With Reference to 73rd and 74th Amendment Acts
4) Ambhedkar Views on Decentralization
5)Critical Analysis on BR Ambhedkar
6) Suggestions

Methodology: This research paper is based on secondary source, that is, on reference books given at the end of my paper.

*Head & Associate Professor (Retd.), Department of Economics, Kakatiya Government (UG&PG) College (NAAC “A” Grade), Hanamkonda, Warangal District (Telangana State). The author was a Member of Board of Studies, Kakatiya University, Warangal – 506 009 (India).
1). Ambhedkar and Panchayat Raj Institutions: Mahatma Gandhi advocated panchayat raj as the foundation of India's political system. It helped for the decentralized form of government, where each village would be responsible for its own governance. The term for such a vision was“Gram Swaraj - Village Self-Governance".  In contrast to this, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar believed that the village represented regressive India, a source of oppression.He argued against Panchayats as he was apprehensive about the continuation of caste Hindus hegemony. Further he opined that villages in India were caste-ridden and had little prospects of success as institutions of self-government. George Mathew puts it aptly, his (B.R.Ambedkar) stand should not be wrongly interpreted as the one against democratic decentralization or the concept of giving power to the people‟. He was only speaking from his experience of what a caste-ridden village society in India had meant to him and to millions like him. Undoubtedly, his perception about the village atmosphere that prevailed at that time was realistic. Hence, he advocated to build safeguards against such social oppression and the only way it could be done was through the adoption of the parliamentary model of politics. 
Gandhi and Ambedkar had different perspectives regarding the politics of Panchayat raj. For Gandhi, the concepts of Gramswaraj and Panchayat raj were integral part of his political vision about the future of our nation. This vision was against the mechanical modal of development that was introduced by the British in our country. So, Gandhi through his social and political initiatives made the country to realize that the power of people which could be strengthen only through effective local self-government. He thus opined “I shall work for an India in which the poorest shall feel that it is their country, in whose making they have an effective voice.” Gandhi always advocated power in the hands of people through the Panchayat Raj. He said, “The greater the power of the people, the better for the people”.
Dr. B.R. Ambhedkar’s critical view on Panchayat Raj was formed by the Indian reality of village life in his period. It was substantiated by his own personal experiences also. So Ambedkar considered Gandhian ideas of Panchayat Raj as passionate. For Ambedkar those villages were nothing “but a sink of localism, a den of ignorance and communalism”. The result was that the Constitution that was drafted under his Chairmanship did not mention a word about Panchayat Raj. During the drafting of the Constitution of India, Panchayat Raj Institutions were placed in the non-justifiable part of the Constitution, the Directive Principles of State Policy, as Article 40. The Article read 'the State shall take steps to organize village Panchayats and endow them with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as units of self-government'. However, no worthwhile legislation was enacted at that time, either at the national or state level to implement it.
Jawahar Lal Nehru took a middle path on Panchayat Raj System. At last, on the recommendations of Balwantrai Mehta Committee,Nehru made a statement in 1960. Panchayat Raj was the most revolutionary development in India.In India, the Panchayat Raj generally refers to the system of local self-government in India introduced by a 73rd constitutional amendment in 1992. Currently, the Panchayati Raj system exists in all states and in Union Territories except Delhi. Panchayati Raj now functions as a system of governance in which gram Panchayats are the basic units of local administration. The system has three levels: Gram Panchayat (Village level), Mandal Praja Parishad at Mandal level or Block Samiti or Panchayat Samiti (Block level), and Zilla Praja Parishad (District level). In today’s context Panchayat Raj has turned to be a powerful political instrument for Dalits to transform the nature of village life about which Baba Saheb had once sympathized with.
2). Ambhedkar Ideas’ on Social Justice (A Social Reformer): History produces a few people who leave an indelible mark on the society as their lives can be seen as a metaphor for liberty, as an icon for progress and change. One such person was a rare combination of immense knowledge, exceptional political prowess and an unwavering commitment to social change was Dr BR Ambedkar. He stressed on a much broader notion of stable reconstruction of our country with inclusive growth and cultural integration in the Nation without caste discrimination. His Hindu code bill was an idea to bring equality and justice in society through emancipation of women by extending equal property rights to women. He has popularly known as the pioneer who initiated the liberation movement of roughly 65 million untouchables in India. He believed in peaceful methods of social change. His vision of democracy and equality was closely related to good society, rationality and the scientific outlook. He held that the emancipation of Dalits in India was possible only through the three-pronged approached of education, agitation and organization. Ambedkar was criticized for focusing on social justice, especially in the elimination of caste system rather than not on national movement. Thus, he was viewed  essentially as a egalitarian and a social reformer rather than a nationalist. He wrote a book on "Annihilation of Caste", in which he strongly opposed caste system. He encouraged inter caste marriages to abolish cast system in our country. Some critics took objection to his opposition to caste system in India and they say that caste system in our country is the result of different professions performed by the respective people. Then, why Ambhedkar blame upper classes, especially Brahmins.He was converted to Buddhism with his followers to clearly express his disapproval to castism. Throughout his life he fought for social justice. According to him, caste system is not merely the division of labour but a division of labourers also. It is a major obstacle to economic development. It reduces mobility leading to inefficient production. Untouchability is worse than slavery and it is nothing but mere exploitation of fellow human beings.
3). B.R. Ambedkar With Reference to 73rd and 74th Constitution Amendment Acts:With reference to 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment Acts, we can remember Ambhedkar view - “The remedy lay in creating an egalitarian and truly democratic panchayat raj system in the country. He also fought for providing reservation in Panchayats to involve all depressed classes in the rural governance”.The Panchayat Raj system was first adopted by the state of Rajasthan in Nagaur district on 2 Oct 1959. During the 1950s and 60s, other state governments adopted this system as laws were passed to establish Panchayats in various states. The second state was Andhra Pradesh, while Maharashtra was the ninth state.Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Act, 1994 in conformity with 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments have provided clear cut proportional reservation to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and 1/3rd for women.There have been concerted efforts since late‟ 80 to revitalize the system and to facilitate participation of all sections of the society. The result was the passing the 73rd Constitution Amendment with high hopes and expectations which B.R.Ambedkar emphasized the need to have the representation of Dalits in decision-making processes and administrative machinery to implement and monitor the policies, measures and programmes. “Representing the interests of Dalits is not just enough”, he said, “He believed the interests could be meaningfully ensured by their own representation and participation in decision-making processes at all levels”. He recommended participation of Dalits in democratic polity at all levels from legislature to execution of policies. In the central scheme of Ambedkar, representation and participation are central. He favoured a fair policy of inclusion of Dalits in democratic polity, economy and society and cultural life of society. Thus, his approach is holistic. 73rd Constitutional Amendment provides for reservation of seats and chair positions to Scheduled Castes in Panchayati Raj Institutions.Articles 243(D) of the Indian Constitution provides that seats and offices are to be reserved for Scheduled Castes (Dalits) and Scheduled Tribes (Adivasis) in proportion to the size of their population within the panchayat, subjected to one-third seats are to be reserved for women belonging to these categories. There is also an enabling clause for states to provide reservations, on similar pattern for the Other Backward Classes (OBCs). The allocation of reserved positions for various categories is to be by rotation in such manner as may be determined by the states. Rajiv Gandhi presented the 64th Amendment to the Constitution to the Lok Sabha on 15 May 1989.  While it did not prove possible to pass the Amendment in Rajivji’s lifetime, almost as a tribute to him, Parliament, virtually unanimously, passed a marginally amended version of that draft as the 73rd Amendment on 23 December 1992. The amendment entered into force on 24 April 1993 which, since 2008, has been celebrated as National Panchayat Raj Day. However, the obstacles have not totally waned where there was a greater need to make the panchayat more inclusive.
4). BR Ambhedkar Views on Decentralization:Dr. Ambedkar was apprehensive that in the hierarchical society with highly skewed nature of asset and power distribution, vesting more powers at the village level would only perpetuate exploitation of the dispossessed.Dr. Ambedkar on 6th October, 1932 made a speech in the Assembly of the Bombay Presidency opposing the introduction of the Panchayats Bill in the Province. It contains his entire standpoint view regarding decentralization of power or administration through Panchayats. Ambedkar started with the following words regarding Panchayat Bill,“I find that the Bill has two parts. The first part deals with the functions of the panchayat as a body for local self-government. I should like to say at once that I have no objection in principle to the policy of devolution; if it is found that the local boards of this Presidency are overburdened by the functions which are placed upon them by the Local Board Act and if by reason of that they are unable to discharge their functions efficiently, then I say " by all means institute village Panchayats so as to disburden the local boards." Sir, if the desire is to constitute Panchayats for their own sake, then to my mind it is a reversion to a very dangerous system. Many have eulogized the ancient system of village Panchayats. Some have called them "rural republics ". Whatever be the merits of these rural republics, I have not the slightest hesitation in saying that they have been the bane of public life of India.”He then built up his argument for a special place for minorities and the depressed classes in the Panchayats. He said,“My next objection is to the constitution of the Panchayats themselves. The Bill, as the honorable member has pointed out, provides that the village Panchayats shall be elected on the basis of adult suffrage both for males and females. I may at once state that, so far as I am concerned, I say "so far so good ", but I should like to make it clear to the Honorable Minister that, speaking for the depressed classes, I have not the slightest hesitation in saying that adult suffrage is not sufficient for us. The Honorable Minister has forgotten that the depressed classes are in a minority in every village, a miserable minority, and assuming that he adopts adult suffrage, he will readily admit I am sure that adult suffrage cannot convert a minority into a majority.  Consequentially I am bound to insist that if these village Panchayats come, there shall be special representation for the minorities. At any rate, there shall be special representation for the depressed classes, and others of course will speak for themselves.”He then continued,Speaking for the depressed classes, therefore, I can never accept the principle of self-government for India unless I am satisfied that every self-governing institution has provisions in it which give the depressed classes special representation in order to protect their rights, and until that is done, I am afraid it will not be possible for me to assent to the first part of the Bill.”Finally, Ambedkar pointed out that the idea of accepting the rights of the depressed classes to representation had already begun to gain currency. He said,In this connection, I would also like to draw the attention of the Hindu members of this honorable House to the recent events that have happened. I refer to the Poona Pact between the Caste Hindus and the Depressed Classes that was signed on the 24/09/1932. Many members, I am sure, must have read the terms of that Pact, but I should like to draw particular attention to one section of it. In that section it has been agreed that the right of the depressed classes to representation in all local bodies shall be accepted and an endeavor shall be made in order to give effect to that part of the agreement. Sir, I would like to draw the attention of the Hindu members to that part of the Pact and I am sure whatever may have been the opinions before 24/09/1932, they will now loyally abide by the terms of that Pact.”It was thus clear that Ambedkar had no objection to the concept of devolution. However, he was very clear that the traditional Panchayats were not equal to the task of handling a modern and inclusive government, and that could be achieved only through a process of affirmative action – he suggested nominations - which ensured that all communities of an unequal society were represented in local governments. Thus, it is clear that Ambedkar notion on decentralization is misunderstood.
5). Critical Analysis on BR Ambhedkar: BR Ambhedkar staunch critic of caste system, led depressed classes against social discrimination. On critical side, the policy of protective discrimination through reservations has been increasingly used to gain political mileage hurting merit system. Some critically oppose Ambhedkar on caste basis reservations, while he was quite against caste system, instead they say that he would have advocated reservations on economic criteria. Every decade reservations are extended for next decade without any sort of analysis. Thus, Ambhedkar's policy has not been applied in true spirit. No political party  in India in true sense is free from gender and caste bias. His reservation policy is not reaching the really needy. In this context Prakash Ambedkar, grandson of the Babasaheb, while talking to Manu Joseph on Outlook Magazine dated: 23/08/2004 said that Legislation doesn’t change people. That’s why B.R. Ambedkar didn’t believe that reservation of constituencies or jobs for Dalits would change the way Indian society looked at its lower castes. He reluctantly agreed to reservation in the belief that it would be discontinued 10 years after the adoption of the Constitution. But half a century later, reservation remains an issue in India”. Addressing officials and representatives of local bodies at an event on smart cities the then Speaker Sumithra Mahajan said, “Ambhedkarji had said, ‘Give reservations for 10 years and after 10 years, do a rethink. Bring them to that stage’. We have done nothing. Even I am guilty of this… We have not thought about it. We do not contemplate why this (a rethink) has not happened.” why we have not achieved the society dreamt of by Dr Ambedkar. We should ponder over the reasons for that also”.Article 334 of the Constitution had originally required the reservation to cease in 1960, but this was extended up to 2020 through 95th Amendment of the Constitution. All political parties are now using Ambhedkar for vote bank and  no one truly tries to reflect his ideology through actions. Simply, monuments and  memorials do not serve the purpose. Practicing his ideology only that makes the difference.

                  Ambedkar influenced more than Gandhi ji’s Harijan Movement. He opposed article 370, which makes Jammu and Kashmir alien to India. Thus, he had a foresight about this article and thought it may be misused. His long struggle for the betterment of Dalits and untouchable will be ever remembered in the history of India. Now, people are remembering him only for his reservation policy and all political parties are not considering his views on land reforms, failure of political reservation for SCs/STs and women empowerment. All are ignoring that he considered higher education as medium for emancipation of oppressed and believing in privatization of higher education, instead of making accessible to all citizens. He came close to Marxian and Weberian (Max Weber a German Sociologist, who emphasized the importance of cultural influences embedded in religion as a means for understanding the genesis of capitalism) conceptions and differs from them. But, Buddha and Marx’s ends remain same but means differ. Ambhedkar accepted Buddhism as an alternative to Hinduism and he wasconverted to Buddhism and influenced masses to convert . Critics say that he was never a real Buddhist. He rejected rebirth and karma, which were part of Buddha dharma. Some people criticize him because he politically opposed Gandhi and supported the British policy of separate electorates in 1927. But, they ignored his role to save Gandhi’s life who had begun a fast unto death at the Yeravadh jail of Poona, against the communal award to depressed classes, Ambedkar and other depressed class leaders agreed to modify the award. As a result, the “Poona Pact” was signed. Under this agreement instead of separate electorates, reservation of seats was provided.

Dr. B.R. Ambhedkar’s critical view on Panchayat Raj was formed by the Indian reality of village life in his period. It was substantiated by his own personal experiences also. So, Ambedkar considered Gandhian ideas of Panchayat Raj as passionate. For Ambedkar those villages were nothing “but a sink of localism, a den of ignorance and communalism”.

Regarding Decentralization (Self Government) Ambhedkar said - Unless I am satisfied that every self-governing institution has provisions in it which give the depressed classes special representation in order to protect their rights, and until that is done, I am afraid it will not be possible for me to assent to the first part of the Bill.”

Arundhati Roy introduces extensively annotated edition of Annihilation of Caste in “The Doctor and the Saint,” examining the persistence of caste in modern India, and how the conflict between Ambedkar and Gandhi continues to resonate. Roy breathes new life into Ambhedkar’s anti-caste utopia, and says that without a Dalit revolution, India will continue to be hobbled by systemic inequality. She faults Ambedkar for his views on the Adivasis, claiming that he didn’t understood them. He saw them as backward, in a "savage state", and in need of civilizing. "Ambedkar speaks about Adivasis in the same patronizing way that Gandhi speaks about untouchables". His views on Hinduism were subjected to lot of criticism by many people. The irony is that a person who played a key role in drafting the constitution of Hindustan was a staunch opposer of Hinduism and tried at all his best level to destroy Hinduism (which for him was a Brahmanism oppressive religion).

Some people say that “If Ambedkar thought his actions will change the society, wipe out poverty, bring equality... then why so much of divide even after the decades, they argue that he did not bridge the gap, but in fact he had widened it”. About his criticism on Brahmins, they say that “There is no doubt Brahmins were scholars and they are today also, they are logical, ofcourse there are exceptions in every society”.In Arun Shourie's book “Worshipping False Gods”, the Dalit apostle, B.R. Ambedkar, is portrayed as a self-centered, unpatriotic, power-hungry anti-national, a stooge of the British. The gravamen of Shourie's charge against Ambedkar is four-fold: (1) He opposed the freedom struggle; (2) He collaborated with the British for material gains; (3) He only piloted the draft constitution and that he can in no way be called the Father of the Constitution; and (4) His conversion to Buddhism was mere opportunism. On the very first page, Shourie states: "There is not one instance, in which Ambedkar participated in any activity connected with the struggle to free the country. But, the supporters of  Ambhedkar says that this is not true, during the Quit India Movement when Ambedkar was a member of the viceroy's executive council, he had the courage to shelter underground Congress leaders like Achyut Patwardhan at his residence. They further argued that  Mr. Shourie ignored  Ambhedkar's attack on the British at the Round Table Conference.
He opposed the caste system in our country and conveyed a good message to all Hindus that if we are divided among ourselves on caste basis and fight with each other, “we will fall prey to our enemies”. That is to say, “if we are united together we stand, if divided we will fall”. Dr. Ambhedkar believed in equality. He respected freedom and liberal democracy. Amartya Sen rightly opined that; freedom is valuable for at least two different reasons.

First, More Freedom gives us more opportunity to pursue our objectives those things that we value. Dr. Ambhedkar also respected freedom and he aimed to develop human beings through this freedom.

Second, Process of Choiceitself. Dr. Ambhedkar provided such choices (Reservations) to the oppressed people through constitutional law. In the beginning Reservations were provided only to SCs and STs under the Article 15 (4) for providing admissions in the educational institutions and under the Article16 (4) for jobs. But, later on this was extended to Other Back Ward Castes (OBCs). Originally, it was stated that these reservations will continue up to 1960 that is for 10 years only and later on they will be discontinued. But, till this date they are continued to gain political advantage out of it to retain in power claiming that they are doing social justice to SCs, STs and OBCs. But, in reality this is entirely a different story. Let us forget a while, a great injustice is done to the economically weaker sections in the Forward Casts (FCs) all these years (more than 70 years) in the name of castes, which Ambhedkar was against. Now, let us suppose, a SC, ST or a BC candidate became an IAS Officer availing reservation facility. But, later on these IAS Officer’s children are also availing reservations for admissions in colleges and in jobs. Due to this system, in their communities only other people are losing chances of getting admissions in reputed institutions and good jobs of higher cadre. At last after a long time on through 124th Amendment Bill2019, 10% Reservations to EBCs in the FCs were approved by the Indian Parliament.

Suggestions:                            
1). Social Justice - Review of Reservation Policy of BR Ambhedkar: Now, the time has come to review the “Reservation Policy of BR Ambhedkar” after 69 years of Indian Constitution came into existence, because at present the situation has been drastically changed. SCs, STs and OBc are now equally treated on par with all the forward castes in the society.
2). For More Social Justice Government should enact that “creamy layer should not be allowed for further reservations”: Government should enact a “creamy layer bill” that is, a  generation already availed reservations should not be allowed for further reservations. Because, due to this system, in their communities only other people are losing chances of getting admissions in reputed institutions and good jobs of higher cadre.
3). Stop Encashing of the Present Reservation Policy for the Sake of Votes and Stop Frustration among the Youth: In the “Present Reservation Policy” most of the bright youth are suffering a great frustration, because most of the youth those born in forward castes even after scoring more than 90% of marks in their competitive exams are not getting seats in Medicine and in other courses which has bright future for them. Even for IAS exams also reservation system is adopted, which require top most brilliant people who will decide the future of our country. SCs, STs or OBCs are selected with low marks for the courses and jobs which has bright future. Hence, “EBC Reservation System of Irrespective of Castes” is the only solution to save our country.
4). If Government is not Alert there will be Great threat to our Social Fabric: Day by day all the castes are demanding reservations irrespective of their economic status, leading to unrest among all the castes and agitations in our country are going on, there by destroying the public property like Railways, Water pipe lines etc., causing lot of inconvenience to the common public. For example, “Jats” Community fighting for reservations in Haryana State to include them in OBC quota, Recent “Kaapus” agitation in Andhra Pradesh to include them in BCs Community list, and some time back in Rajasthan “Gujjars” lead a great agitation to include them in SCs. If Government don’t put a full stop for such type of “present reservation policy” there will be no end for this and ultimately our society will be divided in to fragments and this may even lead for demanding separate regions for separate castes, thus dividing the whole nation on caste – basis, which would be a “great threat to our social fabric”.
5). To be more vibrant, more powers and funds should be given to Gram Panchayats.
6). Decentralization will be meaningful only, if oppressed and suppressed rights are protected and preference is given to them.
7).  SC, ST Atrocity  Act should not  be mis-used.
8). It is observed that  in SC & ST  Reserved Gram Panchayats, other upper class influential people are dominating, hence  Government  must  take  action against these people.
9).  Similarly, in Women Reserved Gram Panchayats also, either husband or in – laws are dominating , hence this should be stopped.
10). It must be observed that  funds  which are earmarked for  particular purpose should be utilized for that purpose only.
Conclusion: Thus, Ambedkarism is the great relevance to the Indian society to achieve social justice, removal of untouchability in establishing equality and true democracy, but with utmost care and periodical review of his various polices. Ambhedkar rose up from dust, from being treated worse than an animal to becoming the father of the Indian Constitution. Dr. Ambhedkar was truly a multi-faceted personality. A Social reformer, a veritable emancipator of Dalits, a great national leader and a patriot, a great author, a great educationalist, a great political philosopher, economist, a great religious guide and above all a great humanist without any parallel among his contemporary.

References:
1). B.R. Ambedkar, What Congress and Gandhi have done to the Untouchables?

2). B. R. Ambedkar, Annihilation of Caste, an undelivered speech written in 1936 by B. R. Ambedkar

3). S. Anand (Ed.), Annihilation of Caste: The annotated critical edition – B.R. Ambedkar – Introduced with the essay ‘The Doctor and the Saint’ by Arundhati Roy, Navayana Publishers, New Delhi, (2014)

4). Outlook Magazine 23/08/2004

5). Jadhav Narendra, Ambedkar: Awakening India’s social conscience, Konark Publishers, New Delhi (2014)

6). Badal Sarkar, Dr. B. R. Ambhedkar’s theory of State Socialism International Research Journal of Social
Sciences, 2, (2013)
7). Lokhande. G. S., B.R. Ambedkar: A study in social democracy. Constituent Assembly Debates, (25-11-1949) vol. xi

8). The 13th Memorial Lecture on Dr. Ambhedkar Lecture, By Paramjit Singh, Judge, Professor of Sociology & Dean, Academic Affairs, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab

9). Arun Shourie -  Worshipping False Gods” ASA Publications

10). Wikipedia Articles on BR Ambhedkar  life and Reservation System in India